
Pressure on Lloyd’s as
Jonathan
Rest
At a forum, organised by The Insurance
Workplace (TIW) in conjunction with the London Market Insurance Brokers’
Committee (LMBC) in London yesterday, brokers took the opportunity to air their
concerns about the ECF, after it emerged that just 220 claims have been
processed electronically since the system went live in December.
With 41 managing agents and 32 brokers
now signed up to the project, many in the market were surprised by the lack of
participation. But Trevor Maddison, senior vice-president for claims and market
services at Marsh, said the statistics had distorted what is really going on.
"This only really started on January
1, 2007," he argued. "Before that, we had been through many pilots
with a small amount of managing agents. Bringing the whole [insurance]
community into play will take time. There are huge changes, and this is why we
have not seen the ‘Big Bang’.
"There is a transition stage and we
need to work with our key members. I am not anticipating until the third or
fourth quarter [of this year] that the volumes we are sending down are all new
claims processed electronically."
One professional indemnity (PI) broker
said his company was not using the ECF because the benefits were not clearly
visible. "As a small PI broker, we only have 200 claims in total. In our
situation, there is not a huge need for us to crash into ECF. The cost benefit
does not add up," he said, adding that it would be "hard to
justify" the licence costs to claims directors.
A broker from BMS said: "The case
for us has been critical mass. We have been caught before on previous projects,
so we do not want to invest in something that may not work. A mandate would
give us a critical mass."
On two occasions last year, at the
Insurance Institute of London Lloyd’s Old Library seminar in October and at the
Xchanging Conference in Brighton a month later, Lloyd’s chief executive,
Richard Ward, threatened to take "whatever action needed", including
a mandate, to ensure the ECF project was a success.
Now
Roy Laker, Acord senior vice-president,
added: "At present, Lloyd’s thinks it will get [electronic claims
processing] done. But if volumes do not progress as they should do, then maybe
it will have to mandate."
Christopher Lee, of Lloyd’s broker Besso,
also believes a mandate is essential to avoid the argument of whether ECF is a
job for claims people or IT staff. "The problem is that everyone is
ducking it. We are all busy so the prospect of taking on more work is
inconceivable. Yes, there is a benefit, but how far down the line is that
benefit? A mandate will be a way forward," he said.
However, when asked by Insurance Day
whether Lloyd’s would mandate the project, a spokesman simply referred to
Ward’s previous remarks with-out making a full commitment the project.
But Jerry Adley, a consultant at Sequel
Business Solutions, believes that mandate or not, the ECF will be a success. He
explained: "This is going to happen and it will be a change to the market.
You either do it because you have to [a mandate] and therefore you have to
decide on the minimum investment, or you embrace it and get the maximum
benefit.
"There is a transition period here
where not everyone will come on board at the same time. You must ask yourself,
how will I get the best benefit?"
jonathan.rest@informa.com